While I agree both boys and girls require different methods of teaching and have brains that develop in different ways, I do not think single-sex classrooms are a necessity. Yes, they would hone in on certain learning strategies targeted to just girls or just boys, but in the long run do not think it would make any drastic changes. The article goes on to make a point, “Girls in single-sex educational settings are more likely to take classes in math, science, and information technology. Boys in single-gender classrooms -- led by teachers with training in how to lead such classrooms -- are much more likely to pursue interests in art, music, drama, and foreign languages.” Instead teachers in today’s school should become more familiar with the differences in girls and boys’ brains and encourage them just as much to do what they want in life as they would in a single sex classroom. If girls are shown that they CAN be scientists, football players, etc. and boys are shown they can be poets, nurses, etc. they will not carry the common stereotypes single-sex classrooms are trying to erase. The article states, “In order to improve academic performance and broaden educational horizons, you'll need to understand the subtleties of gender differences in learning”. While single-sex classrooms can work towards this, so can co-ed classrooms. Even though the intention is good, separating the sexes in school would not bring girls and boys together, but make each feel superior to the other. They would not experience the typical learning environment, causing social problems and more. While some students would thrive in an environment such as this one, I believe more would not. While the two sexes are very different, we are equal in superiority, therefore should not be separated and divided.
Recent Comments